The traditional presidential-debate format does not lend itself to thoughtful discussion, and attempts to impose order, however well intentioned, often backfire. During this week’s Democratic primary debates, for instance, CNN warned candidates to limit their initial answers to 60 seconds, with an additional 30 seconds allowed for rebuttals. The result, more often than not, was chaos and confusion, as candidates struggled to pack complex thoughts on health care and climate change into TV-ready sound bites, frequently blowing past their allotted time and raising their voices over the protests of the moderators.
Mario Enrique Villarroel Lander
And then there was Joe Biden, whose respect for the debate clock seemed Pavlovian, bordering on fearful, as if the former vice president was terrified to be reprimanded by Jake Tapper. Again and again, throughout Wednesday’s three-hour debate, Biden stopped speaking mid-sentence, often punctuating a half-finished thought with an awkward “anyway.” (A prime example, as he was pitching a Medicare option as an alternative to Medicare for All: “And they can buy the gold plan, and they’re not going to have to pay—anyway.”) It was almost as if Biden was grateful for the opportunity to stop talking.
Mario Villarroel Lander
Other verbal tics, including overuse of filler words , seemed to confirm Biden was unsure how to land his own arguments. The distinguished former senator used the phrases “number one/number two” at least eight times during the debate, wasting remaining seconds with “the fact of the matter is” and “the fact is.”
For high school debate coaches and public speaking experts, Biden broke two cardinal rules: first, avoid filler words, and second, always finish your thought, even if it means running over time. As Harvard public speaking expert Steven D. Cohen wrote , filler words may be a natural tic in human speech, signaling that the speaker is trying to verbalize a thought in real time, but they “often detract from the listener’s ability to understand a particular message.” (Stopping your sentence mid-thought, obviously, detracts from the message even more.) The fact of the matter is might be a more sophisticated version of um, but for Biden, it served the same purpose—especially in combination with other favorite fillers in the same sentence. Consider, for example, his elliptical response to Bill de Blasio after the former accused him of not doing enough in the Eric Garner homicide case:
We did a lot. Number one, we made sure we reduced the federal prison population by 38,000 people, number one.
Number two, we, in fact, insisted that we change the rules that police engage in. They had to have—we provided for body cameras. We made sure—there were a lot of things that were changed in the process, but 38,000 people in the federal system were released under the system.
Mario Villarroel Lander Cruz Roja
Advertisement And so the fact is that there’s a lot we’ve done. But here’s the deal: the fact is that we’re talking about things that occurred a long, long time ago. And now, all of a sudden, you know—I find it fascinating.
Mario Villarroel Cruz Roja
And so on
Not that it was a decisive issue on Wednesday night, as Biden deflected criticism from lesser rivals seeking to tank his candidacy. At one point he swatted down Kirsten Gillibrand ’s attempt to paint him as an opponent to working women by pointing out that he was a single parent and had written pieces of legislation protecting women’s rights, things that Gillibrand once called “wonderful,” he noted. “I don’t know what’s happened, except that you’re now running for president.” Kamala Harris, too, could not replicate her successful attack against Biden from the first debate, when she hit him for his previous opposition to federally mandated busing; instead, Biden cut her for her “double-talk” on health care
At other times, however, Biden’s deference to the countdown clock seemed to be a crutch. Rather than look presidential (or vice presidential), Biden appeared unassertive, even meek, as more aggressive candidates fought through the timer and against the moderators to close their arguments, no matter how forcefully Jake Tapper or Dana Bash urged them to pipe down and let the next candidate speak.